Customers & Industries

Diversify beyond EtO:

A more resilient sterilization strategy

NO₂ sterilization is increasingly recognized as a validated, sustainable alternative to legacy technologies like EtO, especially as industry demand grows for safer and more environmentally responsible and supply chain efficient methods.

Diversify your sterilant technologies for business resiliency

Is your sterilization strategy too dependent on EtO?

Ethylene oxide has long been the default sterilization pathway for many medical devices and combination products. But relying on a single modality leaves manufacturers exposed to supply, regulatory, and operational disruptions that a diversified strategy can help manage.

Why Companies Are Re-Evaluating EtO

Supply Chain Risk

EtO sterilization depends on a concentrated network of facilities and providers, creating potential business-continuity exposure when qualified alternatives are limited.

  • Facility outages, capacity constraints, or provider disruptions can affect product availability, launch timing, and service costs.
  • Capacity bottlenecks can increase scheduling dependency and reduce flexibility when demand or supply conditions change.
Click Here

Regulatory & Litigation Pressure

EtO operations face increasing regulatory attention related to emissions and occupational exposure, adding uncertainty to the long-term operating environment.

  • More stringent emissions requirements
  • Greater compliance and reporting requirements
  • Greater management attention to contingency planning and the availability of qualified alternatives
Click Here

Operational Constraints

EtO processing can extend product lead times due to third-party scheduling constraints and aeration requirements.

  • Extended sterilization and aeration timelines
  • Additional inventory buffering requirements
  • Dependency on outsourced sterilization schedules
  • Longer product-release timelines
Click Here

Financial & Working-Capital Impact

EtO dependency can create embedded financial and working-capital impacts:

  • Higher working capital requirements when release timelines are extended
  • Additional logistics and outsourcing coordination costs
  • Production-planning uncertainty when sterilizer capacity is constrained
  • Additional inventory held to protect against sterilization delays
Click Here

ESG & Reputation Considerations

EtO use can bring heightened environmental, occupational, and community considerations—and greater stakeholder scrutiny.

  • Community and public-health scrutiny surrounding EtO facilities
  • Investor and corporate scrutiny within ESG frameworks
  • Reputational exposure associated with environmental or compliance events
Click Here

Beyond EtO: Building a diversified sterilization strategy

There is no single universal replacement for EtO. The more practical strategic model is to qualify additional, best-fit modalities where they make sense. Leading manufacturers are increasingly considering:

  • Multi-modal sterilization portfolios
  • Risk diversification across qualified sterilization pathways
  • Structured evaluation of alternatives by product or product category
  • Product-specific selection of the best-fit sterilization pathway

The goal is not to eliminate EtO overnight. It is to create optionality: qualify another pathway before a disruption, capacity constraint, or product need makes that alternative urgent. These considerations apply both to validating alternatives for existing products and assessing options with de novo development.

OLD MODEL

EtO only

NEW MODEL

EtO + other best-fit modalities

A practical path from EtO dependency to sterilization optionality

Quick Screen

Assess portfolio risk and identify products where an additional sterilization pathway could create value.

Rapid Assessment

Evaluate product fit and demonstrate compatibility and sterilization effectiveness.

Validate

Develop and validate a commercially scalable process that meets quality, supply-chain, and regulatory requirements.

Regulatory

Support the regulatory pathway and obtain required approvals for the additional sterilization approach.

Commercialize

Commercialize, migrate, or dual-source as appropriate to support ongoing supply needs.

Find out whether your product is a candidate for NO₂.

  • Existing product? Start with an Expose & Return Study for a rapid assessment of NO₂ compatibility.
  • Product in development? Schedule a Design Consultation with our experts to evaluate how NO₂ can fit into your product and sterilization strategy.

Alternative sterilization modality selection: Is NO2 a fit for your high-value product?

Noxilizer helps build a second path to sterility — reduce your dependence on EtO without reinventing your product.

Noxilizer quickly helps manufacturers determine whether NO₂ is a fit and fully supports the pathway from initial evaluation through validation and commercial implementation. That means customers can evaluate an additional sterilization pathway without treating the decision as an all-or-nothing EtO replacement project. Our expertise includes:

Material 
compatibility

Feasibility

Validation

Regulatory documentation

Commercialization support

NO2 sterilization: Another qualified pathway to consider

Certain product and process characteristics can make NO2 a strong candidate for evaluation as an additional or alternative sterilization pathway: 

Consider NO2 when:
PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS
  • Biologics / temperature-sensitive products
  • Prefilled syringes
  • Drug-device combination products
  • Sensitive polymers
  • Electronics
Operational & strategic drivers 
  • Short product shelf life
  • Extended aeration constrains product flow
  • EtO residual management is a concern
Need for sterilization resilience / optionality 
  • Supply chain / business continuity risk is high
NO2 sterilization offers a different combination of product-fit, operational, supply-chain, and environmental characteristics than EtO and other alternatives. The right modality should be selected product by product. 

Radiation (γ & x-ray)

• Gamma sterilization depends on Russian-imported Cobalt-60, creating geopolitical risk • Radiation requires massive electricity consumption, driving up costs and environmental impact — long-term sustainability concerns tied to energy usage • Increasing scrutiny around infrastructure and scalability
Click Here

Vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP)

• Some VHP systems require large volumes of water and consumables • Operational and environmental burden at scale
Click Here

When to consider NO2

Characteristic / Need NO2 Gamma VHP
Biologic / drug-device combination product
✓ Strong fit
? Radiation sensitivity can be limiting
? Oxidation sensitivity can be limiting
Prefilled syringe / drug-delivery device
✓ Strong fit
? Product dependent
? Product dependent
Ultra-low processing temperature
✓ 10–30°C
✓
✓
Radiation-sensitive polymers / materials
✓
✕ / ?
✓
Oxidation-sensitive materials
✓ Potential advantage
?
?
Complex device / lumen penetration
✓ Good potential
✓
? Geometry dependent
Cellulose-containing packaging
✕
✓
✕
Rapid post-process release
✓ No lengthy aeration
✓
✓
No ionizing radiation exposure
✓
✕
✓
Onsite sterilization potential
✓
✕ Typically outsourced
✓
Diversification from EtO
✓
✓
✓

Noxilizer's UltraNox 2.0: A commercially scalable alternative to EtO

FOR EXISTING PRODUCTS, Noxilizer’s UltraNox™ 2.0 system provides a commercially scalable terminal sterilization platform for manufacturers evaluating an additional pathway beyond EtO. Its value is strongest where product compatibility, shorter release timelines, or greater sterilization optionality matter.

✓ PROOF & RISK MANAGEMENT

  • Established sterilization science: Defined validation and regulatory pathway; commercialized since 2012
  • Proven regulatory pathway: Technology used in products authorized by FDA and EMA
  • Microbiological efficacy: Proven across multiple microorganisms
  • Ideal for prefilled syringes: Minimal-vacuum process options can help address plunger movement and sterilant-ingress concerns in prefilled syringes
  • EtO alternative: Different toxicological and residual profile and reduced environmental impact compared with EtO
  • Supports environmental and sustainability commitments

✓ OPERATIONAL & SUPPLY-CHAIN VALUE

  • Faster product release: Non-condensing NO₂ and 6–12 hour total processing cycles, including aeration, can shorten release timelines and reduce inventory requirements in appropriate applications.
  • Immediate post-cycle handling: Sterilized product can be handled, packaged, or shipped following cycle completion, without extended aeration.
  • Demonstrated global deployment: Multiple NO₂ sterilization systems are installed and operating globally, including in Europe and Asia

FOR NEW PRODUCTS, NO₂ sterilization’s specific features and trade-offs can provide significant benefits and may, in some cases, expand product and packaging design freedom. Noxilizer’s ultra low-temperature NO₂ sterilization platform gives development teams another terminal sterilization option — potentially expanding the materials, components and product architectures they can consider. For new products, NO₂ sterilization supports:

✓ Greater design freedom

✓ Material flexibility
✓ Complex product architectures
✓ Sustainability

Fewer trade-offs and constraints versus some alternate modalities

In summary, NO2 sterilization is an option to consider for both validating a second modality in addition to EtO, and for de novo product development.

Existing EtO product

KEY ISSUE: RISK & CONTINUITY

NO₂ sterilization benefits:

  • Option to reduce EtO dependence
  • Rapid path to validation

New / De novo product

KEY ISSUE: POTENTIAL PRODUCT DESIGN CONSTRAINTS

NO2 sterilization benefits:

  • Fewer trade-offs
  • Increased design freedom

EtO vs. NO2 sterilization: Where NO2 may offer an advantage

Different sterilization technologies for different product, process and supply-chain requirements
Decision factor EtO NO2 Why it matters
Sterility Assurance Level
0 SAL 1⁻⁶
0 SAL 1⁻⁶
Both achieve the industry-standard sterility assurance level
Processing temperature
Low (ambient–low)
Low (ambient, 10–30°C)
Enables use with heat-sensitive materials and components
Residual concerns
tO / ECH residual limits
No EtO/ECH residuals
Avoids EtO- and ethylene chlorohydrin-related residual testing burden
Aeration time
Extended (days)
Minimal / rapid
Faster time to release and reduced inventory holding
Regulatory pathway maturity
Long-established, widely validated
Established, growing adoption
EtO has the longest regulatory track record; NO2 pathway is maturing
Supply chain / geopolitical exposure
EtO supply and regulatory pressure
Independent of EtO supply constraints
Diversification reduces single-source dependency risk
Environmental / community scrutiny
Elevated — emissions and community concerns
Lower emissions profile
Reduces regulatory and community relations exposure
Material compatibility
Broad, well-characterized
Broad, including sensitive materials
Both support a wide range of polymers and components
Facility footprint
Requires specialized EtO infrastructure
Compatible with on-site or contract processing
Flexibility in sterilization location and capacity planning
Best fit
High-volume, established EtO-validated products
Diversification, sensitive or complex devices
Supports a two-pathway strategy rather than single-modality reliance

Still have questions?
Our team can provide you with more information.

Keep exploring

For devices incorporating electronics, sensors, polymers, batteries, or combination-product elements, NO2 provides another terminal sterilization option to evaluate.

WHY EVALUATE NO2:

Ultra-low-temperature processing (10–30°C) and wide (40-80%) RH ranges creates an option for heat- and-moisture sensitive devices:

  • Ideal for heat- and moisture-sensitive materials, including polymers, electronics, and complex devices
GOOD FIT FOR COMPLEX GEOMETRIES AND PACKAGING:

Gas penetration can support intricate device designs and challenging packaging, subject to validation

NO2 STERILIZATION OFFERS A DIFFERENT SET OF TRADE-OFFS THAN OTHER ETO ALTERNATIVES:
  • Non-ionizing option for products where gamma or e-beam may create compatibility concerns
  • May offer useful material and load compatibility where VHP presents limitations; validate product and packaging fit
POTENTIALLY FASTER TURNAROUND THAN ETO:
  • Total cycles of 6–12 hours, including aeration, can enable faster product release and improved production flow.
  • NO₂’s residual profile can reduce extended degassing and residual-management burdens relative to EtO.
  • Can reduce reliance on large-scale EtO gas-handling infrastructure and associated environmental controls
DIFFERENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS THAN ETO:
  • Provides scalable terminal sterilization capacity and added flexibility when EtO capacity is constrained
CAN SUPPORT FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING AND CAPACITY STRATEGIES:

For prefilled syringes and biologic combination products, NO2 sterilization may be worth evaluating when conventional process conditions create compatibility or release-timeline challenges.

WHY EVALUATE NO2:

Ultra-low-temperature processing (10–30°C) creates an ideal option for heat-sensitive biologics and combination products:

  • Conventional terminal sterilization can create trade-offs involving heat, radiation, humidity, pressure, or residuals.
HIGH HEAT AND RADIATION BOTH DENATURE PROTEINS
IONIZING RADIATION FROM X-RAY AND GAMMA CAN BREAK DOWN THE PROTEIN CHAIN
MINIMAL-VACUUM PROCESS OPTIONS CAN HELP REDUCE THE RISK OF PLUNGER MOVEMENT AND STERILANT INGRESS IN PREFILLED SYRINGES.

Pressure changes (due to vacuums) can force syringe plungers to move, allowing microbes and sterilant to contaminate the biologics

This movement creates risks for:
HEADSPACE

Prefilled syringes have a small amount of gas-filled space between the product and stopper/plunger

PLUNGER MOVEMENT

When exposed to low pressure (vacuum), this air expands and then contracts when then pressure increases, forcing the plunger to move up and down

MICROBIAL PLUNGER VEILING

Veiling occurs when the plunger moves and traps microbes between the plunger and syringe wall, shielding them from sterilant

INGRESS

Plunger movement may pull sterilant into the drug itself and contaminate the biologic API

NO2 STERILIZATION OFFERS A DIFFERENT SET OF TRADE-OFFS THAN OTHER ETO ALTERNATIVES:
  • Non-ionizing option for products where gamma or e-beam may create compatibility concerns
  • May offer useful material and load compatibility where VHP presents limitations; validate product and packaging fit
POTENTIALLY FASTER TURNAROUND THAN ETO:
  • Total cycles of 6–12 hours, including aeration, can enable faster product release and improved production flow.
  • NO₂’s residual profile can reduce extended degassing and residual-management burdens relative to EtO.
  • Can reduce reliance on large-scale EtO gas-handling infrastructure and associated environmental controls
DIFFERENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS THAN ETO:
  • Provides scalable terminal sterilization capacity and added flexibility when EtO capacity is constrained
CAN SUPPORT FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING AND CAPACITY STRATEGIES: