Why Noxilizer

Noxilizer enables terminal sterilization for products that cannot tolerate traditional methods

Terminal sterilization versus aseptic processing alone 

Sterilization is an essential requirement for the pharmaceutical, biotech and medical device industries because even medical innovations manufactured and filled under aseptic conditions can introduce microbial risk to patients.

For some drug delivery devices, especially in ophthalmology, FDA, EMA, and USP <1211> all emphasize that terminal sterilization is preferred over aseptic processing due to its higher sterility assurance level (SAL of 10⁻⁶ vs. 10⁻³).

ASEPTIC PROCESSING ALONE:

Sterility assurance level 
(SAL) = 10-3 = Fewer than 
1 non-sterile unit per 1000

TERMINAL STERILIZATION AFTER ASEPTIC PROCESSING:

SAL = 10-6 = Fewer than 1 
non-sterile units per 1,000,000

Why other methods fails

Traditional terminal sterilization methods (i.e., ethylene oxide [EtO], gamma, heat) are designed for robustness and scale but often introduce compromise for prefilled syringes and biologic drug products: 

High heat and radiation degrade proteins

High heat from EtO, steam, and VHP can lead to protein denaturation:

Ionizing radiation from x-ray and gamma can break the protein chains:

Pressure changes (due to vacuums) can force syringe plungers to move, allowing microbes and sterilant to contaminate the biologic drug products

This movement creates risks for:

HEADSPACE

Prefilled syringes have a small 
amount of gas-filled space between the product and stopper/plunger

PLUNGER MOVEMENT

When exposed to low pressure (vacuum), this air expands and then contracts when the pressure increases, forcing the plunger to move up and down

MICROBIAL 
PLUNGER VEILING

Veiling occurs when the plunger moves and traps microbes between the plunger and syringe wall, shielding them from sterilant

INGRESS 

Plunger movement may pull 
sterilant into the drug itself and contaminate the biologic active ingredient 

RESOURCE — TO LEARN MORE:

Terumo study finds that NO2 did not chemically alter protein in prefilled syringes, whereas EtO and VHP did

Fujiwara S, et al. J Pharm Sci. 2022 Jan;111(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 6. PMID: 34499900.

Noxilizer’s proprietary terminal sterilization process

“The NO2 sterilization process is completed in a vacuum chamber and begins with evacuation of the air in the sterilization chamber. After evacuation, the sterilization chamber is filled with the sterilization process gases which consist of NO2 and humidified air. For most medical devices and drug delivery devices that can tolerate a deep vacuum” of 150 mbars, “the chamber is evacuated to a relatively low vacuum pressure (e.g., 20 mbar; see figure below).

Some drug delivery devices, such as prefilled syringes, are susceptible to piston” (plunger) “movement during the sterilization cycle, due to the influence of the evacuated pressure, which causes the gases in the prefilled syringe to expand. The movement of the syringe piston may allow for the contamination of the syringe contents with both microorganisms and sterilant
gas. To address this issue, a shallow-vacuum cycle has been developed. This type of
shallow-vacuum cycle uses a much higher minimum process pressure (e.g., about 500 mbar
minimum process pressure) compared to typical minimum process pressure levels used
with deep vacuum cycles.”

Excerpt from Ray N, et al. Drug Delivery Device Design and Compatibility with Nitrogen Dioxide Gas Sterilization. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Dec 8;18(12):1869. doi: 10.3390/ph18121869. PMID: 41471358; PMCID: PMC12736310:

With the NO2 process, both deep vacuum and shallow-vacuum cycles have similar process stages. These stages are described below and illustrated in the figure below. The process stages are:

Evacuation

The chamber is evacuated down to the designated minimum process pressure, which removes air from the sterilization chamber, permitting the addition of the process gases.

Humidity Addition

Relative Humidity (RH) is added to the chamber until the desired percentage is reached, typically between 40% RH and 80% RH.

NO2 Injection

The NO2 is metered into the sterilization chamber, with a target concentration typically between 5 mg/L and 20 mg/L.

Pressurization

Dry air is added to the sterilization chamber to reach the target process pressure (dwell pressure), which is typically between
700 mbar and 800 mbar.

NO2 Exposure Stage

The NO2 and RH remain in the chamber for the set dwell time of the NO2 exposure. The dwell time ranges from 5 min to 30 min.

Aerations

Aeration consists of repeated stages of evacuating and refilling the chamber with air until the sterilant is removed from the chamber.
“Some sterilization cycles define the stages listed above as a half-cycle, whereby the biological indicators are found to be sterile after completing these stages. For a sterilization full-cycle, these stages are repeated to achieve the needed sterility assurance level, or SAL, as described in Annex D of ISO 14937:2009. Therefore, a sterilization cycle may consist of two sterilant exposure stages.”

ISO 14937:2009; Sterilization of Health Care Products—General Requirements for Characterization of a Sterilizing Agent and the Development, Validation and Routine Control of a Sterilization Process for Medical Devices. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.

Graph of pressure (mbar) vs. time (minutes) for an example deep vacuum NO2 sterilization cycle.

Figure adapted from Ray N, et al. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025;18(12):1869.

Mechanism of action

NO sterilization works by damaging the DNA and RNA of microorganisms so extensively that they cannot survive or repair themselves. When NO₂ enters the sterilization chamber, it mixes with a small amount of humidity to form reactive nitrogen species, including dinitrogen trioxide (N₂O₃), a potent nitrosating agent. These reactive molecules penetrate spores and cells and break their DNA and RNA strands, preventing the organism from reproducing.

Laboratory studies show that NO₂ causes rapid, irreversible single‑strand DNA breaks (SSB), beginning within minutes. Even one of these breaks is enough to stop a cell or spore from completing mitosis or germination. As exposure continues, the damage accumulates into complete DNA degradation, leaving microorganisms with no ability to recover or repair themselves.

Rapid aeration — hours vs. days

Nitrogen dioxide’s low boiling point allows for rapid aeration.

NO2 does not permeate materials to the same degree as other methods, greatly reducing the overall cycle time of the sterilization process and eliminating the lengthy post-sterilization aeration. (Noxilizer has short overall cycle times of 6–12 hours.) This benefit applies to terminal sterilization using a batch process or high-level decontamination in isolators.

The rapid aeration process results in fewer residuals on product and packaging. Noxilizer’s sterilant residues are non-carcinogenic, non-cytotoxic and non-teratogenic. Sterilized batches can be handled and packaged/shipped immediately without any health risk concerns for employees.

Material compatibility

NO₂ is compatible with many materials

NO2 is less oxidative than traditional oxidizing sterilants like hydrogen peroxide and peracetic acid. Noxilizer has screened many medical device materials including metals, polymers, bioresorbables and adhesives for biocompatibility (cytotoxicity). The ultra-low and room temperature performance of the Noxilizer process allows temperature-sensitive materials to be sterilized.
EXAMPLES OF MATERIALS WITH KNOWN COMPATIBILITY WITH NOXILIZER
Stainless Steel
Borosilicate Glass
Ceramics
Polycarbonate
Polypropylene
Polyethylene
Cyclic Olefins
ABS
Bromo/Chlorobutyl Rubber
Other Fluoropolymers
Viton (gaskets)
UHMW Polyethylene
PTFE/Teflon
Silicone
PMMA
Polyetherimide
PEEK/PAEK
ASTM F75 CoCr
Titanium alloys
Aluminum (Anodized)
Gold Plating
Nitinol

Don’t see a material on this list?

We would be happy to provide you with more information about material compatibility. 

RESOURCE— TO LEARN MORE:

Drug delivery device design and compatibility with NO2 gas sterilization

Ray N, et al. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Dec 8;18(12):1869. doi: 10.3390/ph18121869. PMID: 41471358; PMCID: PMC12736310.

Packaging compatibility

NO₂ is compatible with commonly-used sterile barrier packaging, including:

  • Tyvek® pouches
  • Tyvek® – Mylar® pouches
  • Thermo Formed (PETG) with Tyvek® lids

Noxilizer’s process is not compatible with cellulosic materials such as paper and cardboard. Due to incompatibility of cellulosic materials, consideration needs to be given to labels and inserts that are included during sterilization. Those items can be added after sterilization as part of final packaging.

Why customers choose Noxilizer biological indicators.

Our rigorous characterization program helps customers:

  • Increase confidence in cycle development and validation
  • Reduce variability during qualification studies
  • Support regulatory submissions with robust scientific data
  • Improve process control and monitoring
  • Accelerate sterilization program execution
By characterizing every spore batch and every finished biological indicator lot, Noxilizer delivers a higher level of consistency, reliability, 
and scientific confidence for NO2 sterilization processes.

Every spore batch & every BI lot are fully characterized, supporting validated, reproducible sterility

Biological indicators designed for confidence

When sterilization validation is critical, the quality and consistency of the biological indicator matter. At Noxilizer, we take a scientifically rigorous approach to biological indicator manufacturing by characterizing every spore production batch before application and every finished biological indicator lot after application to the carrier.

This dual-stage characterization provides exceptional lot-to-lot consistency, predictable resistance profiles, and greater confidence that the biological indicator accurately challenges the sterilization process.

A higher standard for biological indicators

Unlike conventional biological indicators that rely primarily on characterization of the initial spore crop, Noxilizer evaluates both the incoming spore population and the finished biological indicator. This approach ensures that the effects of manufacturing and spore application are understood and controlled, resulting in a more reliable challenge system for sterilization validation and routine monitoring.

Using ISO 18472-aligned resistometer methodologies, we evaluate critical performance characteristics including:

Population
Resistance (D-Value)
Survivor Curves
Log-Linear Inactivation Characteristics
Lot-to-Lot Consistency

Designed specifically for 
NO2 sterilization

Noxilizer biological indicators utilize 
Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores with a population greater than 106 CFU on proprietary quartz carriers engineered for nitrogen dioxide sterilization applications.

Key features include:

  • Characterization of every spore production batch
  • Characterization of every finished biological indicator lot
  • Fully characterized resistance profiles
  • Lot-to-lot consistency verification
  • 12-month shelf life
  • Transport stability validation
  • Up to 48-hour post-exposure hold time
  • 42-hour reduced incubation capability
  • Complete quality documentation and traceability

Proprietary, validated, resistometer-measured 
biological indicators (BI)

RESOURCE— TO LEARN MORE:

NO2 sterilization follows log-linear microbial inactivation kinetics using Geobacillus stearothermophilus biological indicators

Richards T, et al. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 1;79(4):379-390. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012997. PMID: 40523727.

Can’t access the full text? Contact us and we will send it to you.

RESOURCE— TO LEARN MORE:

Biological indicators and process challenge devices for nitrogen dioxide sterilization

Lisco D, et al. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2026;60(2):19-31. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-60.2.19. Epub 2026 May 5. PMID: 42085597; PMCID: PMC13143232.

Can’t access the full text? Contact us and we will send it to you.

Is Noxilizer an ideal fit for your product?
Find solutions for you:

Ophthalmic prefilled syringe

Biologic drug-device 
combination product

Medical device

Exploring alternatives 
to ethylene oxide

Still have questions?
Our team can provide you with more information.

Keep exploring

Exploring alternatives to EtO